Wednesday 17 December 2014

Launch of the New Understanding Predation Project


A new initiative by Scotland’s Moorland Forum will improve and provide a wider shared understanding of the relationship between predators and wading and wild game birds.

Scottish Natural Heritage has commissioned the project following discussions with the Scottish Government.

In addition to reviewing scientific knowledge, the novel approach adopted by the project will also allow local knowledge to be incorporated into the work. Member organisations of the Moorland Forum will be invited to provide their views at the start of the project in small focus groups and workshops. At the end of the project, three large seminars, probably held in October 2015, will allow stakeholders to comment on the draft report and see how their input helps shape the final report.

People with an interest in the impact of predation on wading and wild game birds will be encouraged to provide their views and comments throughout the project. Updates on progress will be provided on a regular basis – see below for details.

In developing the proposal, it was accepted that predation is a natural process.  Everyone agreed that this work should aim to help achieve and maintain balanced, healthy populations of all wild birds in Scotland. The project will establish and agree the facts, and then consider the effectiveness of existing management options. A report will be published, at the conclusion of this work in January 2016, and this will provide an agreed position from which solutions to the issues can be developed.

There are three main elements of the work: local knowledge will be gathered through the workshops, scientific knowledge of predator-prey interactions in Scotland will be reviewed, and maintaining good internal and external communications will be an essential part of the project.  Open discussion and exchange of ideas will be established within the Steering Group, across the Moorland Forum and with all those that have an interest in predator/prey relations. This collaborative approach is an important feature of the project.

Understanding Predation will consider predators, not only as a conservation interest in their own right but will also examine how they interact with vulnerable or declining prey species.  The reported decline of wading birds is a cause of great concern, and this project will provide a better and shared understanding of the role that predation has had in this decline.  We will investigate the often-controversial disparity between scientific knowledge and local knowledge arising from the direct observations of local people on the ground. We recognise that these differences can lead to conflict, creating a deadlock between theory and practice, which can seriously hamper constructive progress.

Through discussion, the project will provide a shared understanding of the issues, and this will form a platform from which to seek agreement about how we can best move forward for the benefit of all wild bird species in Scotland. Taking such a novel approach is likely to provide some challenges, but we believe that the effort is justified by the potential for the work to provide enormous benefits for nature conservation.


Contacting the Project
Use the contact form on the website; and
Use the comment facility on the blog posts.

Communication from the project
Webpage on the Moorland Forum’s website;
This Project Blog;
e-Newsletters (these will have a ‘Sign Up’option on the bottom);
The Forum’s Twitter account (@moorlandforum) will be used to draw attention to the publication of new information; and

Printed leaflets and progress reports may be used to supplement this electronic output.

3 comments:

  1. Could you perhaps answer some questions about the project please:

    1. Who will make up the Steering Group and what are their qualifications and experience of interpreting scientific papers?
    2. You state "People with an interest in the impact of predation on wading
    and wild game birds will be encouraged to provide their views and comments
    throughout the project". Does 'people' include interested individuals only within Scotland, only from members of forum membership organisationsor the wider general public?
    3. You write "The reported decline of wading birds is a
    cause of great concern, and this project will provide a better and shared
    understanding of the role that predation has had in this decline." This seems to suggest that you have pre-determined that predation has played a role in the decline, is this the case?
    4. When you talk about "investigating the often-controversial
    disparity between scientific knowledge and local knowledge arising from the
    direct observations of local people on the ground." How do you propose to weight these in terms of how they influence the study? How will the study recognise the depth and value of scientific research vs anecdotal observation?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Alan, many thanks for your interest. It is not the time of year for expansive replies, as I am finishing work for Christmas, this afternoon. I hope you will make do with this short reply and I promise you a longer reply by blog, early in January.


    1. I will publish details of Steering & Research Groups on the Moorland Forum website early in January. Amongst others, we have the support from: Prof Stephen Redpath (University of Aberdeen), Prof Davy McCracken (SRUC) and Dr Chris Wernham (BTO) so we will not lack for firepower in the scientific department.
    2. The focus will be on Scottish issues, as the work is being funded by Scottish Natural Heritage, but we will welcome input from anywhere and anyone. many of the member organisations have a UK footprint, and Song Bird Survival have also offered to contribute to the process.
    3. There is no predetermination over any of the issues. All the scientific evidence will be examined and all factors will be considered.
    4. Weighting of the information is an important issue and the Steering & Research Groups will be considering this before the report is drafted. We are using the term 'local knowledge' in preference to 'anecdotal evidence', as we believe that this better describes the knowledge and experience gained by stakeholders.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ...and finally, I have answered these questions in more detail. See today's post (28 Jan - A Response to Questions). Sorry for the delay.

    ReplyDelete